Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Certain edos should use augmented and diminished more #31

Open
TallKite opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Certain edos should use augmented and diminished more #31

TallKite opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@TallKite
Copy link

Sharp-1 edos shouldn't use up or downs at all. Conventional names like augmented 5th should always take precedence over unconventional names like up-fifth.

19-edo should run P1 A1/d2 m2 M2 A2/d3 etc.
26-edo should run P1 A1 d2 m2 M2 A2 d3 etc.
13\26 = AA4/dd5 (double-aug 4th or double-dim 5th)
33-edo should run P1 A1 AA1/dd2 d2 m2 M2 A2 AA2/dd3 etc.
40-edo should run P1 A1 AA1 dd2 d2 m2 M2 A2 AA2 dd3 etc.
20\40 = AAA4/ddd5 = triple-aug 4th or triple-dim 5th
47-edo should run P1 A1 AA1 AAA1/ddd2 dd2 d2 m2 M2 A2 AA2 AAA2/ddd3 etc.

Sharp-2 edos:
In 38, 45 and 52edo, double-downminor should be more succinctly named diminished. Likewise double-upmajor should be named augmented.
In 52edo, ^^^major should be ^aug and vvvminor should be vdim

Sharp-3 edos IMO shouldn't use double arrows
vvminor --> ^diminished, ^^major --> vaugmented
2\43 --> vA1/^d2, 9\43 --> vA2/^d3, 16\43 --> vA3/^d4
same with 50, 57 and 64 edo

Sharp-4 edos IMO shouldn't use triple arrows
vvvminor --> ^dim, ^^^Major --> vaug
Affects edos 62, 69 and 76
In 76edo, vvvvminor --> dim, ^^^^Major --> aug

Sharp-5 edos IMO shouldn't use triple arrows
vvvminor --> ^^dim, ^^^Major --> vvaug
Affects 67edo only

Sharp-6 edos IMO no quadruple or quintuple arrows
edos 86, 93, 100: vvvvminor --> ^^dim, etc.

Flat-1 edos shouldn't use up or downs at all.
9-edo is good
16-edo: 1\16 should be d1/A2, 8\16 --> d4/A5, 15\16 --> d7/A8
23-edo should run P1 d1 A2 M2 m2 d2/A3 M3 m3 d3 A4 P4 d4 A5 P5 etc.

Flat-2 and flat-3 edos are good (11, 13 and 18)

Some of this is debatable, but it seems the note names follow what I'm recommending, so probably a good idea just for consistency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant