Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About data keep ratio #12

Open
MatsumotoNana78 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

About data keep ratio #12

MatsumotoNana78 opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@MatsumotoNana78
Copy link

Thank you for your wonderful paper!
I have one question:
Are DataKeepRatio and PatchDropRatio related?
In the general coreset methods, for example, if the full dataset size is 50000 and the coreset size is 5000, then DataKeepRatio=0.1(5000/50000).
Is the Dataset Quantization the same?
In Figure 4.(d) of the paper, DataKeepRatio appears to be correlated with PatchDropRatio. i.e. Why are the x-coordinates of the data points not aligned?
image

@vimar-gu
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the question.

Yes, the final data keep ratio is sample_keep_ratio * patch_keep_ratio. In the experiments of this paper, we drop 20% patches for each image, so the data points in the figure are moved to left.

@mmnn-00
Copy link

mmnn-00 commented Aug 29, 2024

Thank you for your reply^^.
By the way, is "Data keep ratio" on the horizontal axis in figure5 also sample_keep_ratio * patch_keep_ratio?
image

@vimar-gu
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes. In this figure, in order that we can compare with previous method under the same data keep ratio, the original sample keep ratio is multiplied with 1.25, so that after dropping patches, the final data keep ratio is the same as other methods.

@mmnn-00
Copy link

mmnn-00 commented Aug 29, 2024

Thank you very much!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants