You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Having a single sequencer being able to control the state of the entire bus would be cool.
the high-bandwidth sequencer could read 4 bytes off the tape at a time and set the 4 quads of the bus to the respective byte, or the creation of a high density tape which would have 32 punches per column.
This is already possible by syncing 4 sequencers and offsetting them on the bus with an external clock, its just a bit cumbersome.
If a high-density tape is placed in the normal sequencer it should either read only the first 8 bits per column or not be possible
putting a regular tape into a high-bandwidth sequencer either should read a tape at 4x speed or act like a basic sequencer by outputting to the first quadrant of the bus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Having a single sequencer being able to control the state of the entire bus would be cool.
the high-bandwidth sequencer could read 4 bytes off the tape at a time and set the 4 quads of the bus to the respective byte, or the creation of a high density tape which would have 32 punches per column.
This is already possible by syncing 4 sequencers and offsetting them on the bus with an external clock, its just a bit cumbersome.
If a high-density tape is placed in the normal sequencer it should either read only the first 8 bits per column or not be possible
putting a regular tape into a high-bandwidth sequencer either should read a tape at 4x speed or act like a basic sequencer by outputting to the first quadrant of the bus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: