-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add command to expand xrefs section in GFF3 files #483
Comments
Can you link to an example of a GFF file please? |
Here is the first few lines of the output of prokka run on a metagenomic sample (downloaded from here in NMDC).
GFF doesn't have a particularly formal way of ensuring identifiers are unambiguous. In some flavours of GFF you will see bona fide CURIEs, sometimes it's somewhat implicit from the key (e.g. cog, pfam, ec_number, ...). See this preprint for recommendations on improving this situation. Now I look at the prokka file again I see that it's not even using the recommended |
I am 97% sure this is out of scope for sssom-py and this should be either it's own tool or something as part of a general gff package. But this seems like a good place to seed the idea.
GFF allows various kinds of annotations in column 9, many of these are CURIEs. It's often useful to expand these. E.g. a gene annotated with an EC by prokka could be expanded to a GO annotation using a GO sssom file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: