Nix.Derivation: vendor parser #127
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…rary fork All credit goes to @sorki and @rickynils for their work on: - Gabriella439/Haskell-Nix-Derivation-Library#26 - Gabriella439/Haskell-Nix-Derivation-Library#24 and of course to @Gabriella439 for the entire library! This commit takes the changes relevant to `Nix.Derivation` and vendors them in-tree. Co-Authored-By: Gabriella Gonzalez <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: sorki <[email protected]> Co-Authored-By: Rickard Nilsson <[email protected]>
|
Closed as not the right way to go about this: #122 (comment) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR vendors the parser component of https://github.com/Gabriella439/Haskell-Nix-Derivation-Library (specifically Sorki's fork with the changes in Gabriella439/Haskell-Nix-Derivation-Library#24) in an attempt to close #122.
Important
The code being vendored is licensed under BSD3, while this project is licensed under GPL3. I am not a lawyer and have no idea how to, or if it is even possible to, dual-license them.
As is likely apparent from my appeal to a higher power in the code
I don't know the best way to handle such a case. Perhaps just
failand don't print the output?