You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
E.g. survey 188183011, page 3, question 1. I can try addressing the same way we treat question_type == "multiple choice", we can add the condition question_subtype == "multi".
I'm less clear what should go in the answer cell. Say you it's a survey about which foods you eat for which meals and you ultimately have the combined column header "dinner - cereal" created from a multiple choice matrix of column = meal and row = food. Should the cell value be cereal? Dinner? Right now it's the column, so dinner.
I'll implement that and leave this issue open. Related issues:
Is it friendlier to return a list-column for multiple choice questions? I think it's more elegant but less manageable for the lay-user.
Why is the function for parsing multiple-choice columns into a single table, tntpr::check_all_recode(), performing weirdly here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
E.g. survey 188183011, page 3, question 1. I can try addressing the same way we treat question_type == "multiple choice", we can add the condition question_subtype == "multi".
I'm less clear what should go in the answer cell. Say you it's a survey about which foods you eat for which meals and you ultimately have the combined column header "dinner - cereal" created from a multiple choice matrix of column = meal and row = food. Should the cell value be cereal? Dinner? Right now it's the column, so dinner.
I'll implement that and leave this issue open. Related issues:
tntpr::check_all_recode()
, performing weirdly here?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: