-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The Big Concept Rename #1011
Comments
Does it mean we'll end up with the
I can't recall any. However, if someone tries to parse, e.g., Microsoft Excel, formulas, they tend to call it Formula Engine. It doesn't mean that I propose to move from |
Yes.
Well, that means we’ll be the first :) |
A few more ideas:
My favorites are Reformula and Formula² / Formula 2 (especially due to the dual meaning: both "Formulas v2" and a pun with Formula One). What do others think? @karger @DmitrySharabin @adamjanicki2 |
I like (already taken) I like that pun with Formula One, too. |
Yeah I like |
group could be item. unless that creates confusion with the notion of list item. I'm trying to understand the exact goals of this module. Is there an effort here to carefully define mavoscript (with it's particular approach to vector arguments, its particular heuristics for interpretation, etc.) and define a compiler for it, or is this a more general formula parser (and if so what makes it different from all the other formula parsers out there)? if the former then mavoscript seems the obvious name? |
The former, see #1013
See first post. |
After collection → list, we should think about other concepts that could benefit from renaming. I’ll start:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: