The following are analyses on EMU performance in the field associated with our paper.
- Calibration - Calibration of soil moisture and light sensors.
- Sensor Comparisons - Comparisons of EMU temperature and humidity readings with those from iButtons and Hobos.
- Hypotheses - A qualitative analysis of how our microenvironmental data matched a priori hypotheses for differences between and within transects.
- Transect Comparison Models - A quantitative analysis of the microenvironmental differences between the woods and meadow transects.
- Within-Transect Models - A quantitative analysis of the microenvironmental differences within transects.
- Paired T-Tests - An alternative analysis of between-transect differences
The following is a list of datasets we collected and use in our analyses.
- Fenton_soil_calibration.csv - Data used for soil moisture sensor calibration (from weighing soil every 5 minutes to measure water content).
- licor-calibration.csv - Data used for light sensor calibration (from comparing with LiCor LI-190)
- Field Data - Data collected from EMUs,
- fentondata-all.csv - Data from all sensor types and transects combined
- ibuttons-combined.csv - Data from the two iButtons
- Data files prefixed with FM are Hobo Pendant data from the meadow transect
- Data files prefixed with FW are Hobo Pendant data from the woods transect
- Data files prefixed by a name are EMU data