Replies: 9 comments 5 replies
-
I'd very much like to see those statistics too. If you are collecting our data without asking, the least you could do is show it to us. Specifically what I would be interested in is which are the most commonly directly installed boost libraries - or rather if people install individual libraries at all or just boost. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This issue hasn’t been updated in a year; if it is still an issue, please reopen. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@PhoebeHui please re-open and maybe escalate within Microsoft. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks, reopen it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Would be ideal, if it could also be addressed ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That's really a good idea! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes, please provide some statistics if possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
So, what is your policy for moving issues to discussions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Seeing aggregated statistics on the download numbers of ports would be really interesting. I have been focusing lately on updating outdated ports and have prioritized ports based on the number of stars on GitHub. If we had information about how popular libraries are on vcpkg, it would be easier to update those ports that affect the most people instead of going by their general popularity on GitHub. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello,
according to the privacy.md document, vcpkg collects metrics about installed ports. It would be helpful if you could publish them in some aggregated and queryable form like for example Debian Popularity Contest does for Debian packages.
Thanks,
Gregor
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions