[fplus] Is it needed to change port name from fplus to FunctionalPlus

[miyanyan]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I find that fplus is mainly used in source code, and FunctionalPlus seems to be more clear :

• in url, github.com/Dobiasd/FunctionalPlus
• in readme, FunctionalPlus is a small header-only library supporting you in reducing code noise and in dealing with...
• in cmake, find_package(FunctionalPlus CONFIG REQUIRED)

Proposed solution

rename this port

Describe alternatives you've considered

/

Additional context

No response

[LilyWangLL]

If the name of this port is modified, it will affect the local cache of the port that has already been installed, and there is a port frugally-deep in vcpkg that depends on this port.
However, on website https://repology.org/projects/?search=FunctionalPlus, the name of this port is functionalplus.

I will convert this issue to discussion, waiting for more suggestions.

[Osyotr]

What else is here to discuss? Pretty much the same story as proj4 - make it alias for new port functionalplus, deprecate fplus and eventually remove it.

[vipcxj]

The port name seem to have to be all lowercase. I customized a port with a capitalized name, and when I named it as is, I got an error and had to change the name to all lowercase. This results in 2 related folders in the share folder, which doesn't affect usage, but it's not perfect!

[dg0yt]

This results in 2 related folders in the share folder, which doesn't affect usage.

This isn't necessary in most cases. At least it is not necessary for CMake config.

[LilyWangLL]

Will be fixed by PR #38346.