-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Margin incorrect at narrow viewport widths #275
Comments
It is a pity that I can’t see what the scrollbars are doing, because the problem is related to the showed/disappeared scrollbar(s). |
@acwolff, as I said above, the issue is observable in the Justified Gallery demo: http://miromannino.github.io/Justified-Gallery/ |
I've also had the same problem for a long time and tired to hide it with a small margin, so it wouldn't be that noticeable. It would be wonderful if this bug could be fixed, as it's quite annoying. |
+1 |
+1 |
PR #286 fixed this for me too. |
PR miromannino#286 attempted to fix a doubled margin between rows, however in my use case, while it solved that, it increased the images per row, thereby reducing the height of each image. Especially with a number of very wide, but short, images, this led each row to be significantly shorter then before miromannino#286. I believe the source of that problem is that after miromannino#286, we'd buffer the next entry, add it's aspect ratio in the `buildingRow`, then determine if the `buildingRow` (while accounting for the aspect ratio a second time) was below the `rowHeight` to flush the row, thereby treating `rowHeight` like a maximum height. It seems the intention prior to miromannino#286 was to tentatively add the next entry's aspect ratio, without buffering it in `buildingRow` yet, to determine if that's push us below the `rowHeight`, and if so, flush the row before that next entry, thereby treating the `rowHeight` like a minimum height. In other words, before miromannino#286, we'd flush the row BEFORE adding the entry that would push us below the configured `rowHeight`, but after miromannino#286, we'd flush the row AFTER adding the entry that pushed us below the `rowHeight`. The root source of the doubled margin was flushing a row with no buffered entries (hence increasing the offset without actually rendering a row). Given an empty buffered entries (start of a new row), if the entry being analyzed had an aspect ratio that'd make it's height less than the configured `rowHeight`, we'd flush the row BEFORE buffering the entry, thereby flushing an empty row. Now, we only attempt to flush the row if we have at least one buffered entry. This should still fix miromannino#223 and miromannino#275 without introducing the side-effects described above.
PR miromannino#286 attempted to fix a doubled margin between rows, however in my use case, while it solved that, it increased the images per row, thereby reducing the height of each image. Especially with a number of very wide, but short, images, this led each row to be significantly shorter then before miromannino#286. I believe the source of that problem is that after miromannino#286, we'd buffer the next entry, add it's aspect ratio in the `buildingRow`, then determine if the `buildingRow` (while accounting for the aspect ratio a second time) was below the `rowHeight` to flush the row, thereby treating `rowHeight` like a maximum height. It seems the intention prior to miromannino#286 was to tentatively add the next entry's aspect ratio, without buffering it in `buildingRow` yet, to determine if that'd push us below the `rowHeight`, and if so, flush the row before that next entry, thereby treating the `rowHeight` like a minimum height. In other words, before miromannino#286, we'd flush the row BEFORE adding the entry that would push us below the configured `rowHeight`, but after miromannino#286, we'd flush the row AFTER adding the entry that pushed us below the `rowHeight`. The root source of the doubled margin was flushing a row with no buffered entries (hence increasing the offset without actually rendering a row). Given an empty buffered entries (start of a new row), if the entry being analyzed had an aspect ratio that'd make it's height less than the configured `rowHeight`, we'd flush the row BEFORE buffering the entry, thereby flushing an empty row. Now, we only attempt to flush the row if we have at least one buffered entry. This should still fix miromannino#223 and miromannino#275 without introducing the side-effects described above.
There seems to be an issue where margins are not consistent at narrow viewport widths. Images with a wide aspect ratio in particular seem to be affected.
You can observe the issue in the Justified Gallery demo. In the screencast below note how the top margin becomes incorrect (doubled?) on the "mountain road" image at a particular viewport width.
I could reproduce the issue in both Chrome and Firefox, Windows 10.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: