We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Surely
destruct q_nice_strong with (b:=b) (k:=k) (m:=mu) (offset:=1) (a:=x) (n:=M) as [cond Hcond]; eauto using Z.lt_gt with zarith.
was not taking 95 seconds when we first wrote that line, and something is going wrong?
Originally posted by @JasonGross in coq/coq#18818 (comment)
fiat-crypto/src/Arithmetic/BarrettReduction.v
Lines 103 to 104 in a8816f0
Is it just the bench machine that is slow, I see 0m15.19s | 520360 ko | Arithmetic/BarrettReduction.vo in 9584e6c
CI dev says 1m38.92s | 774816 ko | Arithmetic/BarrettReduction.vo but I can't find logs that stretch back far enough to see if it was always that way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Surely
was not taking 95 seconds when we first wrote that line, and something is going wrong?
Originally posted by @JasonGross in coq/coq#18818 (comment)
fiat-crypto/src/Arithmetic/BarrettReduction.v
Lines 103 to 104 in a8816f0
Is it just the bench machine that is slow, I see
0m15.19s | 520360 ko | Arithmetic/BarrettReduction.vo
in 9584e6c
CI dev says
1m38.92s | 774816 ko | Arithmetic/BarrettReduction.vo
but I can't find logs that stretch back far enough to see if it was always that way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: