Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhancement request for more streamlined/automated way of loading JSON file #45

Open
msnook opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request vue-refactor capabilities we will add as part of the vue-refactor

Comments

@msnook
Copy link

msnook commented Nov 16, 2018

In order to incorporate Heimdall within standard CI processes, it would be nice to cut out the manual step of having to browse and load the JSON file.
Requesting an enhancement to be able to pass a structured URI to a deployed Heimdall instance, which loads the file directly without having to manually browse and load the file.

@rx294
Copy link
Collaborator

rx294 commented Nov 19, 2018

This might be useful feature for our Jenkins integration as well.

Here is my suggestion:
We should have an optional url param path through which we could provide the local path to the json

if path != null : H-Lite will directly load the json and go straight to the results page

if path = null: H-Lite will work as it does right now starting at the file load page

this way we could use the same H-Lite version for the Jenkins use, we might not even need a Jenkins plugin if we can get create the right url

https://mitre.github.io/heimdall-lite?path=/path/to/json

@aaronlippold @ejaronne @yarick please share your thoughts

@aaronlippold aaronlippold added enhancement New feature or request vue-refactor capabilities we will add as part of the vue-refactor labels Dec 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request vue-refactor capabilities we will add as part of the vue-refactor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants