Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle stubs #1

Open
Gabriel-Darbord opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Handle stubs #1

Gabriel-Darbord opened this issue Dec 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@Gabriel-Darbord
Copy link
Member

Stubs lack the information required by the exporter to faithfully recreate the object.
In particular:

  • attributes are unknown
  • most method data is missing, we know about the methods that are called but they are also stubs so we don't know the parameters

Not sure how to handle such cases yet.

@Gabriel-Darbord Gabriel-Darbord self-assigned this Dec 21, 2023
@NicolasAnquetil
Copy link

maybe in this case we should rely on serialization/de-serailization in the test.
You could create a special method with no parameter that returns directly the deserialized object (and the method would contain the serialization string) ...

??

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants