Rewrite of ProxyServer class

[cusspvz]

This Issue will host all contributors ideas to implement ProxyServer in a new way.

Rewrite should happen at rewrite branch.

[cusspvz]

ping @sadasant @brunocasanova @gabrielpconceicao @daguej @mateusz- @syrp @mbarbu @dfried @mickhansen @janmeier @jaslo

[cusspvz]

Things that we need to change:

• ProxyServer class is created on each .proxy call instead of each Server type
• Super class shouldn't be implemented this way, (maybe this is the cause of Sockets are leaking #4 ? )
• I believe that connection stages should be divided into files.
• Tests aren't covering everything... help wanted
• We have to create a milestone with all changes discussed here, we must discuss if we can maintain the current API.

[sadasant]

Sure, I'll think on that in the following days. I'm traveling right now!
Thanks for the opportunity.
On Sep 17, 2014 7:03 PM, "José Moreira" [email protected] wrote:

Things that we need to change:

• ProxyServer class is created on each .proxy call instead of each
  Server type
• Super class shouldn't be implemented this way, (maybe this is the
  cause of Sockets are leaking #4 Sockets are leaking #4 ? )
• I believe that connection stages should be divided into files.
• Tests aren't covering everything... help wanted
• We have to create a milestone with all changes discussed here, we
  must discuss if we can maintain the current API.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment)
.