orphan: |
---|
This document describes how we test the Swift compiler, the Swift runtime, and the Swift standard library.
We use multiple approaches to test the Swift toolchain.
- LLVM lit-based testsuites for the compiler, runtime and the standard library.
- Unit tests for sub-tools.
- A selection of open source projects written in Swift.
Purpose: primary testsuites for the Swift toolchain.
Contents: Functional and regression tests for all toolchain components.
Run by:
- Engineers and contributors are expected to run tests from these testsuites locally before committing. (Usually on a single platform, and not necessarily all tests.)
- Buildbots run all tests, on all supported platforms.
The testsuite is split into four subsets:
Primary testsuite, located under
swift/test
.Validation testsuite, located under
swift/validation-test
.Unit tests, located under
swift/unittests
.Long tests, which are marked with
REQUIRES: long_test
.Unlike other tests, every long test should also include either
REQUIRES: nonexecutable_test
orREQUIRES: executable_test
.
It is recommended that you run the Swift test suites via utils/build-script
.
For day-to-day work on the Swift compiler, using utils/build-script --test
should be sufficient. The buildbot runs validation tests, so if those are
accidentally broken, it should not go unnoticed.
Before committing a large change to a compiler (especially a language change),
or API changes to the standard library, it is recommended to run validation
test suite, via utils/build-script --validation-test
.
Although it is not recommended for day-to-day contributions, it is also
technically possible to execute the tests directly via CMake. For example, if you have
built Swift products at the directory build/Ninja-ReleaseAssert/swift-macosx-x86_64
,
you may run the entire test suite directly using the following command:
cmake --build build/Ninja-ReleaseAssert/swift-macosx-x86_64 -- check-swift-macosx-x86_64
Note that check-swift
is suffixed with a target operating system and architecture.
Besides check-swift
, other targets are also available. Here's the full list:
check-swift
Runs tests from the
${SWIFT_SOURCE_ROOT}/test
directory.check-swift-only_validation
Runs tests from the
${SWIFT_SOURCE_ROOT}/validation-test
directory.check-swift-validation
Runs the primary and validation tests, without the long tests.
check-swift-only_long
Runs long tests only.
check-swift-all
Runs all tests (primary, validation, and long).
SwiftUnitTests
Builds all unit tests. Executables are located under
${SWIFT_BUILD_ROOT}/unittests
and must be run individually.
For every target above, there are variants for different optimizations:
- the target itself (e.g.,
check-swift
) -- runs all tests from the primary testsuite. The execution tests are run in-Onone
mode. - the target with
-optimize
suffix (e.g.,check-swift-optimize
) -- runs execution tests in-O
mode. This target will only run tests marked asexecutable_test
. - the target with
-optimize-unchecked
suffix (e.g.,check-swift-optimize-unchecked
) -- runs execution tests in-Ounchecked
mode. This target will only run tests marked asexecutable_test
. - the target with
-executable
suffix (e.g.,check-swift-executable-iphoneos-arm64
) -- runs tests marked withexecutable_test
in-Onone
mode. - the target with
-non-executable
suffix (e.g.,check-swift-non-executable-iphoneos-arm64
) -- runs tests not marked withexecutable_test
in-Onone
mode.
If you need to manually run certain tests, you can invoke LLVM's lit.py script directly. For example:
% ${LLVM_SOURCE_ROOT}/utils/lit/lit.py -sv ${SWIFT_BUILD_ROOT}/test-iphonesimulator-i386/Parse/
This runs the tests in the test/Parse/ directory targeting the 32-bit iOS
Simulator. The -sv
options give you a nice progress bar and only show you
output from the tests that fail.
One downside of using this form is that you're appending relative paths from the source directory to the test directory in your build directory. (That is, there may not actually be a directory named 'Parse' in 'test-iphonesimulator-i386/'; the invocation works because there is one in the source 'test/' directory.) There is a more verbose form that specifies the testing configuration explicitly, which then allows you to test files regardless of location.
% ${LLVM_SOURCE_ROOT}/utils/lit/lit.py -sv --param swift_site_config=${SWIFT_BUILD_ROOT}/test-iphonesimulator-i386/lit.site.cfg ${SWIFT_SOURCE_ROOT}/test/Parse/
For more complicated configuration, copy the invocation from one of the build
targets mentioned above and modify it as necessary. lit.py also has several
useful features, like timing tests and providing a timeout. Check these features
out with lit.py -h
.
--param gmalloc
will run all tests under Guard Malloc (macOS only). Seeman libgmalloc
for more information.--param swift-version=<MAJOR>
overrides the default Swift language version used by swift/swiftc and swift-ide-test.--param interpret
is an experimental option for running execution tests using Swift's interpreter rather than compiling them first. Note that this does not affect all substitutions.--param swift_test_mode=<MODE>
drives the various suffix variations mentioned above. Again, it's best to get the invocation from the existing build system targets and modify it rather than constructing it yourself.
When adding a new testcase, try to find an existing test file focused on the same topic rather than starting a new test file. There is a fixed runtime cost for every test file. On the other hand, avoid dumping new tests in a file that is only remotely related to the purpose of the new tests.
Don't limit a test to a certain platform or hardware configuration just because this makes the test slightly easier to write. This sometimes means a little bit more work when adding the test, but the payoff from the increased testing is significant. We heavily rely on portable tests to port Swift to other platforms.
Avoid using unstable language features in tests which test something else (for example, avoid using an unstable underscored attribute when another non-underscored attribute would work).
Avoid using arbitrary implementation details of the standard library. Always prefer to define types locally in the test, if feasible.
Avoid purposefully shadowing names from the standard library, this makes the test extremely confusing (if nothing else, to understand the intent --- was the compiler bug triggered by this shadowing?) When reducing a compiler testcase from the standard library source, rename the types and APIs in the testcase to differ from the standard library APIs.
In IRGen, SILGen and SIL tests, avoid using platform-dependent implementation details of the standard library (unless doing so is point of the test). Platform-dependent details include:
Int
(use integer types with explicit types instead).- Layout of
String
,Array
,Dictionary
,Set
. These differ between platforms that have Objective-C interop and those that don't.
Unless testing the standard library, avoid using arbitrary standard library
types and APIs, even if it is very convenient for you to do so in your tests.
Using the more common APIs like Array
subscript or +
on IntXX
is
acceptable. This is important because you can't rely on the full standard
library being available. The long-term plan is to introduce a mock, minimal
standard library that only has a very basic set of APIs.
If you write an executable test please add REQUIRES: executable_test
to the
test.
Substitutions that start with %target
configure the compiler for building
code for the target that is not the build machine:
%target-typecheck-verify-swift
: parse and type check the current Swift file for the target platform and verify diagnostics, likeswift -frontend -typecheck -verify %s
.Use this substitution for testing semantic analysis in the compiler.
%target-swift-frontend
: runswift -frontend
for the target.Use this substitution (with extra arguments) for tests that don't fit any other pattern.
%target-swift-frontend(mock-sdk:
mock sdk arguments)
other arguments: like%target-swift-frontend
, but allows to specify command line parameters (typically-sdk
and-I
) to use a mock SDK and SDK overlay that would take precedence over the target SDK.%target-build-swift
: compile and link a Swift program for the target.Use this substitution only when you intend to run the program later in the test.
%target-run-simple-swift
: build a one-file Swift program and run it on the target machine.Use this substitution for executable tests that don't require special compiler arguments.
Add
REQUIRES: executable_test
to the test.%target-run-stdlib-swift
: like%target-run-simple-swift
with-parse-stdlib -Xfrontend -disable-access-control
.This is sometimes useful for testing the Swift standard library.
Add
REQUIRES: executable_test
to the test.%target-repl-run-simple-swift
: run a Swift program in a REPL on the target machine.%target-run
: run a command on the target machine.Add
REQUIRES: executable_test
to the test.%target-jit-run
: run a Swift program on the target machine using a JIT compiler.%target-swiftc_driver
: runswiftc
for the target.%target-sil-opt
: runsil-opt
for the target.%target-sil-func-extractor
: runsil-func-extractor
for the target.%target-swift-ide-test
: runswift-ide-test
for the target.%target-swift-ide-test(mock-sdk:
mock sdk arguments)
other arguments: like%target-swift-ide-test
, but allows to specify command line parameters to use a mock SDK.%target-swift-autolink-extract
: runswift-autolink-extract
for the target to extract its autolink flags on platforms that support them (when the autolink-extract feature flag is set)%target-clang
: run the system'sclang++
for the target.If you want to run the
clang
executable that was built alongside Swift, use%clang
instead.%target-ld
: runld
configured with flags pointing to the standard library directory for the target.%target-cc-options
: the clang flags to setup the target with the right architecture and platform version.%target-triple
: a triple composed of the%target-cpu
, the vendor, the%target-os
, and the operating system version number. Possible values includei386-apple-ios7.0
orarmv7k-apple-watchos2.0
.%target-cpu
: the target CPU instruction set (i386
,x86_64
,armv7
,armv7k
,arm64
).%target-os
: the target operating system (macosx
,darwin
,linux
,freebsd
,windows-cygnus
,windows-gnu
).%target-object-format
: the platform's object format (elf
,macho
,coff
).%target-runtime
: the platform's Swift runtime (objc, native).%target-ptrsize
: the pointer size of the target (32, 64).%target-swiftmodule-name
and%target-swiftdoc-name
: the basename of swiftmodule and swiftdoc files for a framework compiled for the target (for example,arm64.swiftmodule
andarm64.swiftdoc
).%target-sdk-name
: only for Apple platforms:xcrun
-style SDK name (macosx
,iphoneos
,iphonesimulator
).%target-static-stdlib-path
: the path to the static standard library.Add
REQUIRES: static_stdlib
to the test.
Always use %target-*
substitutions unless you have a good reason. For
example, an exception would be a test that checks how the compiler handles
mixing module files for incompatible platforms (that test would need to compile
Swift code for two different platforms that are known to be incompatible).
When you can't use %target-*
substitutions, you can use:
%swift_driver_plain
: runswift
for the build machine.%swift_driver
: like%swift_driver_plain
with-module-cache-path
set to a temporary directory used by the test suite, and using theSWIFT_TEST_OPTIONS
environment variable if available.%swiftc_driver
: like%target-swiftc_driver
for the build machine.%swiftc_driver_plain
: like%swiftc_driver
, but does not set the-module-cache-path
to a temporary directory used by the test suite, and does not respect theSWIFT_TEST_OPTIONS
environment variable.%sil-opt
: like%target-sil-opt
for the build machine.%sil-func-extractor
: run%target-sil-func-extractor
for the build machine.%lldb-moduleimport-test
: runlldb-moduleimport-test
for the build machine in order simulate importing LLDB importing modules from the__apple_ast
section in Mach-O files. Seetools/lldb-moduleimport-test/
for details.%swift-ide-test
: like%target-swift-ide-test
for the build machine.%swift-ide-test_plain
: like%swift-ide-test
, but does not set the-module-cache-path
or-completion-cache-path
to temporary directories used by the test suite.%swift
: like%target-swift-frontend
for the build machine.%clang
: run the locally-builtclang
. To runclang++
for the target, use%target-clang
.
Other substitutions:
%clang-include-dir
: absolute path of the directory where the Clang include headers are stored on Linux build machines.%clang-importer-sdk
: FIXME.%clang_apinotes
: runclang -cc1apinotes
using the locally-built clang.%sdk
: only for Apple platforms: theSWIFT_HOST_VARIANT_SDK
specified by tools/build-script. Possible values includeIOS
orTVOS_SIMULATOR
.%gyb
: rungyb
, a boilerplate generation script. For details seeutils/gyb
.%platform-module-dir
: absolute path of the directory where the standard library module file for the target platform is stored. For example,/.../lib/swift/macosx
.%platform-sdk-overlay-dir
: absolute path of the directory where the SDK overlay module files for the target platform are stored.%swift_src_root
: absolute path of the directory where the Swift source code is stored.%{python}
: run the same Python interpreter that's being used to run the currentlit
test.%FileCheck
: like the LLVMFileCheck
utility, but occurrences of full paths to the source and build directories in the input text are replaced with path-independent constants.%raw-FileCheck
: the LLVMFileCheck
utility.%empty-directory(
directory-name)
: ensures that the given directory exists and is empty. Equivalent torm -rf directory-name && mkdir -p directory-name
.
When writing a test where output (or IR, SIL) depends on the bitness of the target CPU, use this pattern:
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend ... | %FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=CHECK-%target-ptrsize %s // CHECK: common line // CHECK-32: only for 32-bit // CHECK-64: only for 64-bit // FileCheck does a single pass for a combined set of CHECK lines, so you can // do this: // // CHECK: define @foo() { // CHECK-32: integer_literal $Builtin.Int32, 0 // CHECK-64: integer_literal $Builtin.Int64, 0
When writing a test where output (or IR, SIL) depends on the target CPU itself, use this pattern:
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend ... | %FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=CHECK-%target-cpu %s // CHECK: common line // CHECK-i386: only for i386 // CHECK-x86_64: only for x86_64 // CHECK-armv7: only for armv7 // CHECK-arm64: only for arm64 // CHECK-powerpc64: only for powerpc64 // CHECK-powerpc64le: only for powerpc64le
FIXME: full list.
swift_ast_verifier
: present if the AST verifier is enabled in this build.- When writing a test specific to x86, if possible, prefer
REQUIRES: CPU=i386_or_x86_64
toREQUIRES: CPU=x86_64
. swift_test_mode_optimize[_unchecked|none]
andswift_test_mode_optimize[_unchecked|none]_<CPUNAME>
: specify a test mode plus cpu configuration.optimized_stdlib_<CPUNAME>
: an optimized stdlib plus cpu configuration.SWIFT_VERSION=<MAJOR>
: restricts a test to Swift 3 or Swift 4. If you need to use this, make sure to add a test for the other version as well unless you are specifically testing-swift-version
-related functionality.XFAIL: linux
: tests that need to be adapted for Linux, for example parts that depend on Objective-C interop need to be split out.
This feature marks an executable test. The test harness makes this feature generally available. It can be used to restrict the set of tests to run.
Tests accept command line parameters, run StdlibUnittest-based test binary
with --help
for more information.
In execution tests, memory management testing should be performed
using local variables enclosed in a closure passed to the standard
library autoreleasepool
function. For example:
// A counter that's decremented by Canary's deinitializer. var CanaryCount = 0 // A class whose instances increase a counter when they're destroyed. class Canary { deinit { ++CanaryCount } } // Test that a local variable is correctly released before it goes out of // scope. CanaryCount = 0 autoreleasepool { let canary = Canary() } assert(CanaryCount == 1, "canary was not released")
Memory management tests should be performed in a local scope because Swift does
not guarantee the destruction of global variables. Code that needs to
interoperate with Objective-C may put references in the autorelease pool, so
code that uses an if true {}
or similar no-op scope instead of
autoreleasepool
may falsely report leaks or fail to catch overrelease bugs.
If you're specifically testing the autoreleasing behavior of code, or do not
expect code to interact with the Objective-C runtime, it may be OK to use if
true {}
, but those assumptions should be commented in the test.