Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we add videos? #4

Open
jellis18 opened this issue Jan 27, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Should we add videos? #4

jellis18 opened this issue Jan 27, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@jellis18
Copy link
Collaborator

There are several pulsar timing and GW videos on youtube. Should we add them?

@jellis18 jellis18 changed the title Should we add videos Should we add videos? Jan 27, 2017
@stevertaylor
Copy link
Collaborator

Depends what they are. If they are just promo videos, like the John Rowe or the more recent NANOGrav video, then those are not so instructional. But if they go into the concepts then sure.

@stevertaylor
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, perhaps we should make short (~1 minute) long videos on pulsar-timing concepts. Kind of like a mini-Coursera course.

@jellis18
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@stevertaylor, yes I was thinking of maybe our CAJAGWR talks and @scottransom has a good one too. Maybe these...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2f0mdVEUpO0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyNBmgZ-j4M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJh4_uHS35M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyBnBCxvQQ4
https://youtu.be/6Yb7EE-tWlc
https://youtu.be/rKpFFTGbaDc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsO5oTIgh1c

In terms of the ~1 minute video that is a good idea but could end up being a lot of work.

@stevertaylor
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah, these look good. The ~1 minute videos might need some work, but it could be an interesting diversion for Friday war-rooms.

@cmingarelli
Copy link
Collaborator

cmingarelli commented Jan 27, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants