Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add info on setup and pypi for release #24

Open
nathanshammah opened this issue Apr 3, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Add info on setup and pypi for release #24

nathanshammah opened this issue Apr 3, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nathanshammah
Copy link
Owner

  • Add info on local twine check
twine check dist/*
@nathanshammah nathanshammah added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 3, 2020
@gitcoinbot
Copy link

Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done


This issue now has a funding of 25.0903 USD (25.0 USD @ $1.0/USD) attached to it.

@Sentouky12
Copy link

https://github.com/Sentouky12/scikit-project/tree/patch-1
for the list of classifiers

@gitcoinbot
Copy link

gitcoinbot commented Feb 19, 2021

Issue Status: 1. Open 2. Started 3. Submitted 4. Done


Workers have applied to start work.

These users each claimed they can complete the work by 264 years, 7 months from now.
Please review their action plans below:

1) trustwalletwc has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I have been poking around in gitcoin for about a week now. This is the first I have replied too, and I plan on doing everything required to become an active community member.
2) sentouky12 has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I will try to help you on this one
3) tri1st has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I will do my best for the best
4) 51bitquant has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

Hello, I am interested in this project. pls refer to my github profile. https://github.com/51bitquant
5) drinkingjava has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I work with python everyday. I use to do packaging as well at some point. Will send you a merge request with a little proposal so that you can tell me exactly what you need.
6) legitapple has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I carefully read and will fulfill all your requirements. This would be my first job here on gitcoin.
7) chethan-4255 has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I will Create a PyPi to publish an Open Source Python Package to PyPi
8) oxnytemarexo has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I'd love to help out! Just point me in the right direction and the rest will be as perfect as it can get 😁
9) pfilz0 has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I'm up for this. Sounds like fun and I'm programming in python every day anyway.
10) shubhank-saxena has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

Is this issue still open? I would love to take this up!
11) niraj-kamdar has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

I am a proficient python developer and I can help you create a setup script with the best practices. I am also the author of the manylinux-wheel-builder which is a GitHub action for auto-deploying your python package. I would be more than happy to help you setup CD pipeline.
12) lofibot-22 has applied to start work (Funders only: approve worker | reject worker).

Hello Nathan,

Please message me through my twitter so that I can help you and find out a solution to your issue
https://twitter.com/_Advaith_S
my twitter ⬆️

Advaith S

Learn more on the Gitcoin Issue Details page.

@abitrolly
Copy link

@nathanshammah it looks like this issue is about improving documentation. Could you clarify the accepted criteria for clearing this Gitcoin bounty?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants