Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dropped support for linux_armel between 0.6.3 and 0.7.0? #80

Open
Bogdan-Vasile opened this issue Nov 16, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Dropped support for linux_armel between 0.6.3 and 0.7.0? #80

Bogdan-Vasile opened this issue Nov 16, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@Bogdan-Vasile
Copy link

Hi,

I updated recently the bridj version in one of the projects that I'm working on and I saw that I can't use it on a linux/armel machine.

The old bridJ version was 0.6.3-20130316190111-13, and the new version is 0.7.0.

After comparing jars for the two, I saw that the library for linux_armel was missing.

Was there a reason for removing it, or is it something that I'm doing wrong?

Thank you in advance for your support.

Bogdan

@Zubnix
Copy link

Zubnix commented Nov 16, 2015

afaik, dyncall (that bridj uses) doesn't support armel/armhf with callbacks (at the time?). Therefore armel/armhf support is completely disabled(?). Really sad as it makes BridJ not usable for me.

@Bogdan-Vasile
Copy link
Author

Hi Zubnix,
Bridj was working on linux_armel with version 0.6.3.... and the current version contains a linux_armhf library.... I don't know enough about this project to say anything about dyncall or dyncallback ( as I saw in #40 ).
At least for now I'll switch to 0.6.3 snapshot, which does support the platform I'm working on.
But it would be good to know if it is a permanent problem or just a glitch.

@Zubnix
Copy link

Zubnix commented Nov 19, 2015

Afaik armel support was dropped in 0.7.0.

However I do see that http://hg.dyncall.org/pub/dyncall/dyncall/rev/a461b6977b52 removed the 'support armhf callback' TODO, which I assume means armhf callback should be working!

@ochafik ^ Could you pretty please make a version with a working armhf?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants