-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add MANC symmetric surface #11
Comments
neuropil or tissue? We don't really have a good combined neuropil right now (just the one with many individual neuropil domains). For the time being you can do
as per https://flyconnectome.github.io/malevnc/reference/mirror_manc.html#examples which I'm sure you've seen |
@dokato simplified the all-tissue mesh and that could be symmetrised. |
I meant just the tissue. |
Sure, see #15 |
@mmc46 Were you think these
and get them? |
Yes, something like that.
… On 13 Jun 2021, at 18:26, Gregory Jefferis ***@***.***> wrote:
@mmc46 Were you think these all-tissue masks would be called MANC.surf and MANCsym.surf, respectively, so that one could do:
plot3d(MANC)
plot3d(MANCsym)
and get them?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
@dokato I think it would be good if you would update the names of the two surfaces to |
What happens then with:
? IMHO the naming was good, as it indicated that this is a tissue surface. |
|
Indeed, I should have saved it with parameter to support backward compatibility, however, even quicker fix might be bumping up the minimum R version to 3.5, since even that is quite old as for now. I'm about to fix naming anyway here, once @jefferis decides what to do with old MANC.surf object. |
Is it possible to add a surface for the
MANCsym
template brain object?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: