Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement __has_include() now we have a proper expression evaluator #53

Open
ned14 opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Implement __has_include() now we have a proper expression evaluator #53

ned14 opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@ned14
Copy link
Owner

ned14 commented Oct 29, 2020

No description provided.

@willwray willwray mentioned this issue Nov 21, 2022
Closed
@willwray
Copy link

A workaround, for the case that all __has_include(...) conditions should evaluate true or false
is to define a function macro on the commandline. E.g. on bash, with quotes:

pcpp -D__has_include'(...)=1' test.h

@willwray willwray mentioned this issue Nov 28, 2022
Open
@ned14 ned14 mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ned14 @willwray