We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reminder from @aquette : improvement over the 1rst gen website generator (as currently used with networkupstools.org)
For asciidoc + bootstrap, it mainly relies on the J's/ subdir plus this asciidoc conf for bootstrap: https://github.com/42ity/42ity-org-website/blob/master/bootstrap.conf
And a bit of salt in the Makefile too.
As per http://laurent-laville.org/asciidoc/bootstrap/, the version in 42ity is the latest (2015 😕). So no need to update the integration
UPDATE: Some more links for reference:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
see #31
Sorry, something went wrong.
Code samples in bootstrap rendering look odd, like doubly-quoted replies (with the left bar).
Actually, the "NOTE" sections also have that bar (but this could at least be hand-waved away as separating the "note" icon from its block of text).
@aquette : any ideas if this is about something in CSS invovled?
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Reminder from @aquette : improvement over the 1rst gen website generator (as currently used with networkupstools.org)
For asciidoc + bootstrap, it mainly relies on the J's/ subdir plus this asciidoc conf for bootstrap:
https://github.com/42ity/42ity-org-website/blob/master/bootstrap.conf
And a bit of salt in the Makefile too.
As per http://laurent-laville.org/asciidoc/bootstrap/, the version in 42ity is the latest (2015 😕). So no need to update the integration
UPDATE: Some more links for reference:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: