-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SOLUTION: re-run with at least --limitSjdbInsertNsj #156
Comments
This is strange, the according parameter To eliminate other influences, could you try running the test configuration with the parameter enabled? If it still fails, I think the following line is most suspicious: |
That works!
|
Something just caught my eye in your original error message:
The commit d4199c40a8 does not contain the parameter |
You are right. When I try to run my script, it seems like I do not have the latest version, and I get the following message:
However, when I run the test code, it appears to be updated. |
So I guess there is no pipeline-specific problem here. If you need help updating the pipeline properly let me know, otherwise feel free to close the issue. |
How can I update the pipeline properly? Using
|
Interesting, as both runs refer to I would probably delete |
Deleting |
There's not really much I can do to help you with this, but I can give you some hints:
|
It seems that the Thanks for your help! |
Good to hear! |
Description of the bug
Hello!
I am trying to solve the following error, but I am not able to use the parameter
--limitSjdbInsertNsj
to resolve it.Thank you very much for your time and assistance in resolving this issue.
Command used and terminal output
Relevant files
No response
System information
Nextflow: 23.04.2
Hardware: HPC
Executor: slurm
Container: Apptainer
OS: Linux
nf-core/circrna: dev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: