You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we have our flake-inputs Github Action for updating the flake packages. We have discovered that the current solution is not great as each package may have different needs or update mechanisms while the current action only uses nix-update.
A better mechanism should be the introduction of passthru.updateScript and customizing, where necessary, how the package might want to update itself. This is the approach that nixpkgs currently uses, and ideally, we should explore a similar solution (if not using the same tooling).
So far, we should explore:
How we can integrate from nixpkgs both maintainers/{update.nix,update.py} scripts into this flake.
If not possible, adapt it to meet our needs.
Update our repository Github Actions to run effectively the update mechanism.
Before submitting
I have verified that my idea is a change request and not a bug report
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context
No response
Description
Currently, we have our
flake-inputs
Github Action for updating the flake packages. We have discovered that the current solution is not great as each package may have different needs or update mechanisms while the current action only usesnix-update
.A better mechanism should be the introduction of
passthru.updateScript
and customizing, where necessary, how the package might want to update itself. This is the approach thatnixpkgs
currently uses, and ideally, we should explore a similar solution (if not using the same tooling).So far, we should explore:
nixpkgs
bothmaintainers/{update.nix,update.py}
scripts into this flake.Before submitting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: