You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 4, 2022. It is now read-only.
I found that I can remove all assignees from a closed issue with a command like this, run from the directory of the git repo with an associated GitHub remote:
gh is --assign --assignee "" --number 362
--which may not have been any behavior that was intended for gh. What I want is an --unassign-all switch (feature request I suppose, unless it is intended behavior for an empty string assignee to remove all assignees).
Meanwhile, some side effects of this is that it reopened the issue and removed labels from the issue, and I don't want it doing either of those things--I want it to do only what I tell it to.
I don't know whether GitHub's API is making those (presumptuous) choices or gh. If the former this is not an issue with gh.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
However, their api endpoints have since updated and seem to be more granular.
We have not updated to their latest version yet so resolving this quickly is unlikely. I am in the process of building out our test suite so that we can confidently make sweeping changes like this.
I found that I can remove all assignees from a closed issue with a command like this, run from the directory of the git repo with an associated GitHub remote:
gh is --assign --assignee "" --number 362
--which may not have been any behavior that was intended for
gh
. What I want is an--unassign-all
switch (feature request I suppose, unless it is intended behavior for an empty string assignee to remove all assignees).Meanwhile, some side effects of this is that it reopened the issue and removed labels from the issue, and I don't want it doing either of those things--I want it to do only what I tell it to.
I don't know whether GitHub's API is making those (presumptuous) choices or
gh
. If the former this is not an issue withgh
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: