Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

incident-extension-ef765651: Shouldn't the new SDOs have an extension_type property? #2

Open
rpiazza opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

incident-extension-ef765651: Shouldn't the new SDOs have an extension_type property? #2

rpiazza opened this issue Jan 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@chisholm

Comments

@rpiazza
Copy link
Contributor

rpiazza commented Jan 1, 2024

No description provided.

@chisholm
Copy link
Contributor

chisholm commented Jan 2, 2024

When you use @CustomObject, extension type new-sdo or new-sro is implied (you can choose with the is_sdo arg to the decorator). Having an extension_type class property would be redundant. So it is only used with @CustomExtension.

rpiazza pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2024
@robthew
Merge pull request #2 from robthew/updated_iep_marking
752481c 
Updated iep marking
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@chisholm chisholm

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@chisholm @rpiazza