We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I don't know much much we have evaluated the raggedness, I expect we have a lot of:
where the common superclass of these is very much higher up
and I would expect this would be far worse across ontology (species-species, phenotype-trait) than within
Originally posted by @cmungall in #817 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to mapping-commons/mh_mapping_initiative#15
Sorry, something went wrong.
rays22
No branches or pull requests
I don't know much much we have evaluated the raggedness, I expect we have a
lot of:
precise pato term than in ph 1
where the common superclass of these is very much higher up
and I would expect this would be far worse across ontology
(species-species, phenotype-trait) than within
Originally posted by @cmungall in #817 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: