You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to inquire if RO employs a set of best practices for the the textual definitions of relations or if there is a set of best practices / review criteria / wording patterns that would lend themselves for formulating such definitions in general.
Like all OBO ontologies, definitions are provided using an http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115 'definition' AP.
We strive to give each OP a definition. In practice we may omit definitions for OPs that are trivially the inverse of another defined OP (TODO link to tracker).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to inquire if RO employs a set of best practices for the the textual definitions of relations or if there is a set of best practices / review criteria / wording patterns that would lend themselves for formulating such definitions in general.
With respect to definitions the RO documentation only states that:
Like all OBO ontologies, definitions are provided using an http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115 'definition' AP.
We strive to give each OP a definition. In practice we may omit definitions for OPs that are trivially the inverse of another defined OP (TODO link to tracker).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: