Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing 'resource' field in schedule exceptions and 'Add Exception' button not working #9802

Open
modamaan opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #9799
Open

Missing 'resource' field in schedule exceptions and 'Add Exception' button not working #9802

modamaan opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #9799
Assignees

Comments

@modamaan
Copy link
Contributor

modamaan commented Jan 6, 2025

Describe the bug
The schedule exceptions functionality is missing the resource field, which is crucial for proper data handling. Additionally, the "Add Exception" button is not functioning as intended, preventing users from successfully adding exceptions. Furthermore, the "Delete" button in the schedule template is not working, making it impossible to remove existing templates.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to 'schedules button on sidebar'
  2. switch to Availability
  3. toggle to exceptions and click add exception

Expected behavior

  1. The resource field should be present and functional in the schedule exceptions feature to ensure proper data handling
  2. The "Add Exception" button should work as intended, allowing users to successfully add new exceptions.
  3. The "Delete" button in the schedule template should function correctly, enabling users to remove templates when needed.

Screenshots
problem 1
Image

problem2
Image

problem3
Image

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [windows]
  • Browser [chrome]
  • Version [131.0.6778.109]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@modamaan
Copy link
Contributor Author

modamaan commented Jan 6, 2025

@Jacobjeevan @rithviknishad i would like to work on this

@Jacobjeevan
Copy link
Contributor

Rithvik is already handling a lot of related stuff in #9799.

Assigning to him instead.

@rithviknishad
Copy link
Member

already solved day before yesterday 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants