Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vulnerable undefined property lookup that escalating prototype pollution to remote code execution #316

Open
jackfromeast opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@jackfromeast
Copy link

jackfromeast commented May 15, 2023

Hello,

I've identified another prototype pollution gadget within the doT template engine that could potentially be leveraged by attackers to achieve remote code execution via prototype pollution vulnerabilities. It is similar to issue #291.

Root Cause

The existence of these gadgets can be attributed to a specific programming practice. When checking for the presence of a property within an object variable, the lookup scope isn't explicitly defined. In JavaScript, the absence of a defined lookup scope prompts a search up to the root prototype (Object.prototype). This could potentially be under the control of an attacker if other prototype pollution vulnerabilities are present within the application.

Some vulnerable coding patterns are as follows.

if(obj.prop){ //... }
var x = obj.prop || ''

Impact

If the application server is using the doT as the backend template engine, and there is another prototype pollution vulnerability in the application, then the attacker could leverage the found gadgets in the doT template engine to escalate the prototype pollution to remote code execution.

Proof of Concept

Below, I present a Proof of Concept (PoC) to demonstrate the identified gadgets within the doT template engine. This scenario arises when developers compile their template functions into a JavaScript file and then require them for use. Contrasting with issue #291, this situation no longer necessitates developers to pass empty as data to the compiled function.

The doT version currently in use is ^1.0.3.

Gadget 1

var doT = require('dot');

Object.prototype.global = "}process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync(\`sleep 10\`)}())//";

const templates = doT.process({path: __dirname+'/views'});
var mytemplate = require(__dirname+'/views/mytemplate.js')

General Suggested Fix

To mitigate this issue, I recommend constraining the property lookup to the current object variable. This can be achieved by utilizing the hasOwnProperty method, particularly when there's no requirement to traverse through the prototype chain.

if(obj.hasOwnProperty('prop')){ //... }
var x = obj.hasOwnProperty('prop') ? obj.prop : ''

By adopting this practice, we can effectively prevent the potential exploitation of prototype pollution vulnerabilities.

Finally, I kindly ask for your confirmation of these identified issues and would greatly appreciate your willingness to address them in the future. Should there be any need for further assistance or discussion, do not hesitate to reach out.

@shyeun
Copy link

shyeun commented Nov 29, 2023

may i ask you this comment received feedback from developer?
i think this module was throwed :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants