You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently there is one factor (:guided) responsible for flagging if that scenario should be counterfactual, unguided or guided, but this same factor is also responsible for indicating which MCDA to use in case of :guided scenarios. This way, if I want to run scenarios with :counterfactual, :unguided and :guided scenarios but, for the guided, use only one MCDA method, it involves a lot of gymnastics. Hence I think we need a way of choosing only one MCDA method.
I don't think that's possible with only the addition of a single method. This probably involves the addition of a new factor mcda_method.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently there is one factor (
:guided
) responsible for flagging if that scenario should be counterfactual, unguided or guided, but this same factor is also responsible for indicating which MCDA to use in case of:guided
scenarios. This way, if I want to run scenarios with:counterfactual
,:unguided
and:guided
scenarios but, for the guided, use only one MCDA method, it involves a lot of gymnastics. Hence I think we need a way of choosing only one MCDA method.I don't think that's possible with only the addition of a single method. This probably involves the addition of a new factor
mcda_method
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: