ExpectedEquipment :: temperature

[openBackhaul]

No default value defined in the ONF CoreIM.

Currently, §32 of chapter 9 of the TransmitterEquipment Spec. says that ExpectedEquipment :: temperature shall not be represented.
The YANG module generated from the ONF CoreIM is structured in such a way that ExpectedEquipment and ActualEquipment share the same set of attributes.

If the definition of the ExpectedEquipment :: operationalState would be defined in such a way that a smaller number of attributes would be compared and representing all attributes would no longer be excluded in §32,
and if we would agree that it is not reasonable to define a temperature at an expected equipment,
we should define a value to be permanently represented.

Potential Proposal:
If the mentioned changes would be made, §32 of chapter 9 of the TransmitterEquipment Spec shall be complemented with the following statement "Whenever the ExpectedEquipment :: temperature is represented it should have "" (empty Sting) as a read-only value."

[openBackhaul]

Decision during the LF ONMI x-haul call on 24th of April 2024:
It is not reasonable to define a temperature for an expected equipment.
If the definition of the ExpectedEquipment :: operationalState would be changed as proposed in the latest proposal in issue#38, §32 of chapter 9 of the TransmitterEquipment Spec. shall be complemented with the following statement 'The temperature shall always represent "".'

[openBackhaul]

Has been updated in Equipment_3.0.0-tsi.240515.1100+spec.1.doc