Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ActualEquipment :: EquipmentType :: version #48

Closed
openBackhaul opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

ActualEquipment :: EquipmentType :: version #48

openBackhaul opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@openBackhaul
Copy link
Owner

No default value defined in the ONF CoreIM.

In general, it is expected that a valid entry in this field is supporting identifying the right components in the live network.
If some component would not have a version, or the device not provide such information a default value should be provided.

Potential Proposal:
The two entries for the version in the two tables in §31 of chapter 9 of the TransmitterEquipment Spec. shall be complemented with the following statement "If some vendor, respectively hardware would not apply the concept of versions, an empty string shall be provided. If the device would apply versions, but not be able to provide the version information, "Version not yet provided." shall be represented as a default."

@openBackhaul openBackhaul self-assigned this Mar 27, 2024
@openBackhaul
Copy link
Owner Author

openBackhaul commented Apr 3, 2024

Proposal to the LF ONMI x-haul call on 24th of April 2024:
The default value of the EquipmentType :: version attribute (both ActualEquipment and ExpectedEquipment) has already been covered in Equipment issue#38.
If decided as proposed, this issue would be a duplicate and shall just be closed.

@openBackhaul
Copy link
Owner Author

Issue has been closed without further activity after Equipment issue#38 has been decided as proposed.

@openBackhaul openBackhaul added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed Proposal_made labels Apr 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant