Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Connector_Pac::_connectedOdu [0..1] attribute to be added #57

Open
openBackhaul opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Connector_Pac::_connectedOdu [0..1] attribute to be added #57

openBackhaul opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@openBackhaul
Copy link
Owner

openBackhaul commented Oct 22, 2024

Problem:
The connection between IDU (IF connector) and ODU is currently documented as an instance of a "virtual" Holder that is referencing the ODU in its occupyingFru attribute, but there is no joint between the instance of
Connector that is actually terminating the physical connection to the ODU and this instance of Holder (see also airInterface issue#63).

Proposal to the LF ONMI x-haul call on 13th of November 2024:
A new Connector_Pac::_connectedOdu [0..1] : Holder attribute shall be added and hold the following comment "This attribute is mandatory for all instances of Connector that are used for connecting an ODU. It shall reference an instance of Holder that is referencing an ODU in its _occupyingFru attribute. This attribute shall not be represented in all other instances of Connector."

@openBackhaul
Copy link
Owner Author

Decision during the LF ONMI x-haul call on 13th of November 2024:
A new Connector_Pac::_connectedOdu [0..1] : Holder attribute shall be added and hold the following comment "This attribute is mandatory for all instances of Connector that might be used for connecting an ODU. It shall reference an instance of Holder that might reference an ODU in its _occupyingFru attribute. This attribute shall not be represented in all other instances of Connector."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant