Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About Fluorescence Microscope (infinity) #91

Open
Mzyetik opened this issue Jul 17, 2022 · 13 comments
Open

About Fluorescence Microscope (infinity) #91

Mzyetik opened this issue Jul 17, 2022 · 13 comments

Comments

@Mzyetik
Copy link

Mzyetik commented Jul 17, 2022

Dear All,

Some of the component links dont work (especially this one 1x Objective lens, No Name, 100x, NA1.25, 50 Euro, China ) in the Infinity Florescence Microscope page:

https://github.com/openUC2/UC2-GIT/tree/v3/APPLICATIONS/APP_Fluorescence_Microscope_infinity

We would be happy if it could be updated.

Besides, here we wonder about the objective lens. In this Florescence Microscope, do we need a special objective florescence lens? (which 10 times around more expensive). Or are the non-florescence objective lenses currently suggested proper also for florescence?
We highly appreciate your answer in case we may buy directly a florescence objective lens instead a normal one.

many thanks

@beniroquai
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for reaching out.
In general the quality of the objective lens is determined by its name (e.g. apochromat). Fluo usually means that you have additional antireflection coating. Additional information is nicely summarized here https://www.microscopyu.com/microscopy-basics/introduction-to-microscope-objectives

Decent lenses for relatively low pice are available from Nikon and Bolioptics
e.g. https://www.bioform.de/shop.php?action=tree&wg=2&pid=5107&treeid=5308
and https://bolioptics.com/microscope-parts-accessories/objective/infinite/

Looking forward to your PR :)

@Mzyetik
Copy link
Author

Mzyetik commented Jul 19, 2022

Thank you also for your kind answer about Fluorescence

How about achieving phase contrast in your setup? Do they need special objectives as we are used to?

many thanks

@beniroquai
Copy link
Contributor

beniroquai commented Jul 20, 2022 via email

@Mzyetik
Copy link
Author

Mzyetik commented Jul 26, 2022

Many thanks for your kind answers, I hope we can mount it on UC2 microscope setups, by the way how to print focus_inlet_linearflexure https://github.com/openUC2/UC2-GIT/blob/master/CAD/RAW/STL/20_focus_inlet_linearflexure_v2-3_1x1_v3.stl
image
we were not successful although did several trials , especially the support is not removable , we would be happy for your kind advice.

@beniroquai
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @Myzetik,

thanks for your message. In fact, this stage is already fairly old and I cannot support this design anymore. We moved to NEMA stepper motors in our recent results.
If you send a photo, perhaps I can tell what could be improved ;)

@Mzyetik
Copy link
Author

Mzyetik commented Jul 27, 2022

Thank you very much for your answer, and informing about the new version. I checked it as well https://github.com/openUC2/UC2-GIT/blob/v3/CAD/RAW/STL/UC2_20_Cube_Insert_Z-Focus_single_motorized_v3.stl regardless of new or old version, the 3D printer requires to use support to print these nicely designed structures but then it is not possible to remove the support as seen the one on the picture.
20220727_163202
We are so curious how could they be printed (what is the trick to manage it with normal PLA printers, here we use Ultimaker 2+ . Many thanks for your support and patience :)

@beniroquai
Copy link
Contributor

Did you try printing without the support? Not sure if @b286 has any insights here ;)

@wbrett87
Copy link

Hi, if you havn't resolved this issue yet:

  1. Flip it over in your slicer software so the largest area touches the printing bed.
  2. Print WITHOUT support - this is what helped the most for me. Your printer should be able to "bridge" this distance.

@beniroquai
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!:)
In general: if you use the full prusa ecosystem including their filament and slicer, chances of a successfully printed microscope are very high. :)

@wbrett87
Copy link

I used a Creality 3 ender pro with good results

@beniroquai
Copy link
Contributor

beniroquai commented Aug 16, 2022 via email

@wbrett87
Copy link

I used Inland blue PLA(from Microcenter here in US). It needs hotter temps than your average PLA but once I figured that out it worked great. I can't remember the settings offhand but I will put them here when I get home from work. I used the Ultimaker Cura slicer.

@Mzyetik
Copy link
Author

Mzyetik commented Aug 16, 2022

Thanks a lot, some of our friend used water soluble support material but it resulted with a warped holder, then the better solution is your suggestion we will try it, thank you again for the continuing discussion, it is quite informative

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants