You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A number of states, such as Washington, have dramatically different file structures that vary from election to election and county to county for precinct-level results. We should think of a way to organize and publicize the need to implement these. In many ways these are an easy, atomic way for a volunteer to plug in since they only have to review and understand a single file rather than an entire state's, or election's worth. Also, some utility functions or base classes for dealing with the state will already have been written.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@zstumgoren, I think this is the way to go forward for the short-term: to identify small, election-specific code contributions in loader classes for states, and publicize them. Let's discuss.
A number of states, such as Washington, have dramatically different file structures that vary from election to election and county to county for precinct-level results. We should think of a way to organize and publicize the need to implement these. In many ways these are an easy, atomic way for a volunteer to plug in since they only have to review and understand a single file rather than an entire state's, or election's worth. Also, some utility functions or base classes for dealing with the state will already have been written.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: