Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Codeblocks files are gone #297

Open
SynchromaAE opened this issue Dec 15, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Codeblocks files are gone #297

SynchromaAE opened this issue Dec 15, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@SynchromaAE
Copy link

In every version of OF from 0.9.0 onwards, the Codeblocks workspace files (.workspace) or project files (.cbp) are not included. The book needs to be updated to reflect this, possibly with a "Making a new OF project in Codeblocks" page. I am a beginner with OF and Codeblocks, but not with coding, and this is a serious omission for beginners.

@arturoc
Copy link
Member

arturoc commented Dec 15, 2018

Hi, OF doesn't support codeblocks anymore, there's installation manuals for the officially supported IDEs in the OF download page. Is there any explicit mention to codeblocks in the book? if so can you point out where so we can remove them?

@hamoid
Copy link
Contributor

hamoid commented Dec 15, 2018

It's here: https://openframeworks.cc/ofBook/chapters/setup_and_project_structure.html

I created a screenshot for the book. Although I'm not sure what to write about it...

QtCreator

QtCreator is a cross platform free/libre IDE. It is quite "light" in terms of downloading but powerful nonetheless.
qtcreator-of

@roymacdonald
Copy link
Member

Hi! @SynchromaAE Thanks for pointing this out.
I will take care of this.
@hamoid Thanks for the screen shot! :)

Cheers

@hamoid
Copy link
Contributor

hamoid commented Dec 15, 2018

Welcome :) BTW, there's more mentions of code::Blocks.
See https://github.com/openframeworks/ofBook/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22code%3A%3Ablocks%22&type=

@roymacdonald
Copy link
Member

@hamoid @arturoc is QtCreator actually free/libre? I mean, does it comply with the proper meaning of the term, like software libre, rather than simply being able to download it without paying for it (Gratis)?
Also, I see that there are some out dated stuff for the other IDEs. I'll fix that too.

@hamoid
Copy link
Contributor

hamoid commented Dec 15, 2018

@arturoc
Copy link
Member

arturoc commented Dec 16, 2018

@roymacdonald perhaps it's easier to just remove any mention of any particular IDE and just mention that the guides to install each IDE on each platform are in the downloads section. Even the VS reference seems super outdated now

That way whenever we add new IDEs or just update versions there's no outdated instructions

You could include mentions of well known IDEs but making very clear that are just examples, not mentioning any specific version and linking to the install guides so there's no confusions like this

@roymacdonald
Copy link
Member

@arturoc yeah. you're right. I was going to include the links to each setup guide but it is much better as you say. I think that it is still a good idea to keep the screenshots as these make sense with the chapter's logic.
cheers

@roymacdonald
Copy link
Member

Hi @SynchromaAE , @arturoc , @hamoid
I just made a lot of improvements. Please check this PR. #298
Some proof reading will be welcome.
cheers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants