Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PAR in OID4VP and client_id_scheme #23

Closed
OIDF-automation opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

PAR in OID4VP and client_id_scheme #23

OIDF-automation opened this issue May 7, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@OIDF-automation
Copy link

Imported from AB/Connect bitbucket: https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1925

Original Reporter: KristinaYasuda

When PAR is used in OID4VP, does client_assertion_type parameter replace client_id_scheme parameter?

If PAR is followed as defined, the natural behavior would be to also include client_id_scheme in the object.

@aarmam
Copy link

aarmam commented Oct 18, 2023

I have same question if PAR is used in OpenID4VP in combination with OAuth 2.0 Attestation-Based Client Authentication
@Sakurann @tlodderstedt can you comment on this?

@Sakurann Sakurann removed bug labels Feb 1, 2024
@Sakurann Sakurann added the question Further information is requested label Jun 14, 2024
@Sakurann
Copy link
Collaborator

this has been resolved by #263, since client_id_scheme parameter is now removed and client id scheme is part of client_id

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants