Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

data/bootstrap/files/etc/motd: Mention release-image.service #2884

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Jan 6, 2020

Catching up with d1ec85a (#2234).

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 6, 2020
@wking wking force-pushed the motd-mention-release-image-service branch from a419c02 to f15a406 Compare January 6, 2020 22:50
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, lgtm

/cherry-pick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.3 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

Thanks, lgtm

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

why do we want to add this service to the message? bootkube.sh is the primary one that people should care about.
how do we know when to add any other to the list?
also what use-case/ user-flow do we see this adding value to?

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

jstuever commented Jan 7, 2020

/lgtm

nit: maybe recommend a single call with -u release-image.service -u bootkube.service.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 7, 2020
Catching up with d1ec85a (data/bootstrap: extract ironic images
from release image, 2019-08-19, openshift#2234).
@wking wking force-pushed the motd-mention-release-image-service branch from f15a406 to 8626b5e Compare January 11, 2020 05:32
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2020
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jan 11, 2020

nit: maybe recommend a single call with -u release-image.service -u bootkube.service.

Done with f15a406 -> 8626b5e.

why do we want to add this service to the message? bootkube.sh is the primary one that people should care about.

And release-image is a prereq. But probably not the only prereq. I'm also fine dropping this MoTD completely and assuming folks know how to investigate systemd services. #2569 would help catch things like insufficient registry auth once the user waited long enough for the installer to give up and scrape down logs. @smarterclayton suggested also possibly reducing inside-the-script retries like this endless loop so folks looking for failing units would notice the pull failures. I'm fine with anything in this space, and while mentioning this unit in the MoTD seemed like a cheap win, I'm fine with any combination of the above possibilities (and likely additional ideas not listed above) to make it easier for users to discover why their install is stuck.

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jan 12, 2020

/retest

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2020
@jstuever jstuever removed their assignment Jan 13, 2020
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, jstuever

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 29, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 19, 2020

@wking: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 8626b5e link /test e2e-libvirt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@smarterclayton: new pull request created: #3143

In response to this:

Thanks, lgtm

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@wking wking deleted the motd-mention-release-image-service branch February 25, 2020 03:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. version/4.5
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants