Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ucp_worker.c:728 Assertion `wiface->activate_count > 0' failed: iface 0x43f3800 (tcp/lo) #10376

Closed
ivanallen opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@ivanallen
Copy link

Describe the bug

Backgroud: #10370

An assert occurs on the server when the client establishes a connection with the server.

What could possibly be the cause?

Steps to Reproduce

  • UCX version used: ucx 1.17

Setup and versions

  • OS version (e.g Linux distro) + CPU architecture (x86_64/aarch64/ppc64le/...)
Linux node223 4.18.0-305.3.1.el8_4.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jun 17 07:52:48 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
@ivanallen ivanallen added the Bug label Dec 13, 2024
@yosefe
Copy link
Contributor

yosefe commented Dec 13, 2024

Can you pls try UCX version 1.18 or master branch? There were few related fixed.

@ivanallen
Copy link
Author

Hi, @yosefe

After I upgraded to 1.18.0, it seems that the communication between 1.17.0 and 1.18.0 is not compatible?

@yosefe
Copy link
Contributor

yosefe commented Jan 5, 2025

Hi, @yosefe

After I upgraded to 1.18.0, it seems that the communication between 1.17.0 and 1.18.0 is not compatible?

This is possible. What is the error, and are there any UCX env var being used?

@ivanallen
Copy link
Author

Hi, @yosefe
After I upgraded to 1.18.0, it seems that the communication between 1.17.0 and 1.18.0 is not compatible?

This is possible. What is the error, and are there any UCX env var being used?

Thanks.

Since the product is not currently in production, I have forced the upgrade to 1.18.0. I think we can close this issue.

@yosefe yosefe closed this as completed Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants