We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
webwork-open-problem-library/OpenProblemLibrary/macros/CollegeOfIdaho/CofIdaho_macros.pl
Line 502 in 233a1b1
My brother goes to college, and a homework problem on the website was asking the following question:
However, even though it accepts the following answer as correct:
5x^3y^2(3xy+1)
it says the following one is INCORRECT (even though the Answer Preview shows the same mathematical expression for both inputs):
5x**3y**2(3xy+1)
This seems to be happening because of the formatting of the answer string in the code where asterisks are removed.
In his orientation for WeBWorK, my brother was taught that both ^ and ** can be used interchangably for exponentiation, as can also be seen in here.
Is this a bug or are we misunderstanding something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
webwork-open-problem-library/OpenProblemLibrary/macros/CollegeOfIdaho/CofIdaho_macros.pl
Line 502 in 233a1b1
My brother goes to college, and a homework problem on the website was asking the following question:
Factor out the greatest common factor:$15x^4 y^3 + 5x^3y^2$ .
However, even though it accepts the following answer as correct:
it says the following one is INCORRECT (even though the Answer Preview shows the same mathematical expression for both inputs):
This seems to be happening because of the formatting of the answer string in the code where asterisks are removed.
In his orientation for WeBWorK, my brother was taught that both ^ and ** can be used interchangably for exponentiation, as can also be seen in here.
Is this a bug or are we misunderstanding something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: