docs: add note about chainsaw

[eddycharly]

Description of the change:

Add note about chainsaw in the docs.

If you need more infos 👇

• GitHub: https://github.com/kyverno/chainsaw
• Docs: https://kyverno.github.io/chainsaw
• Slack: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C067LUFL43U

Motivation for the change:

We presented chainsaw to the community meeting last week and received good feedback.
It would be awesome to have it listed in the docs.

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

• Add a new changelog fragment in changelog/fragments (see changelog/fragments/00-template.yaml)
• Add or update relevant sections of the docs website in website/content/en/docs

[eddycharly]

cc @camilamacedo86 @varshaprasad96

[camilamacedo86]

Following the discussion we had via Slack, I wanted to share some thoughts on the PR.

The operator-sdk includes a feature called scorecard, which utilizes kuttl. This is the reason kuttl is mentioned in the documentation. However, chainsaw is not included or shipped with the project (or is the core of any test feature supported by it). Therefore, I'm not sure if it's appropriate to include it in the documentation.

Including chainsaw might lead the operator-sdk maintainers into a situation where they have to answer questions and provide support for a tool that is not a direct part of the project. It can be challenging for maintainers to support third-party tools and integrations.

I am no longer an active maintainer of the SDK project, so I'll leave the decision to those currently maintaining the project to determine what best fits their strategy.

[eddycharly]

Thanks for chiming in @camilamacedo86 !

Operator SDK can support chainsaw scorecard test, here is the PR #6676 😄

I'm fine with answering chainsaw related questions if any.

[eddycharly]

@jberkhahn do you have any suggestion after the yesterday meeting ? what is the next step ?

[varshaprasad96]

This looks good to me. As a scaffolding tool we are listing the possible options and redirecting user to the external documentation.

Thanks for the PR @eddycharly!
/lgtm

[eddycharly]

Thanks @varshaprasad96 😍

Do I need to fix something ?

[openshift-ci]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[eddycharly]

@varshaprasad96 i lost your LGTM 🙏

[varshaprasad96]

Going to go ahead and merge this, as it has been open for review for a few days! If folks have any issues/further discussions w.r.t to this PR, please feel free to create issues :)