Change RPL Inflation (proposals range from changing distribution eligibility to removing inflation altogether)
- Total RPL Inflation is at 5%
- 1.5% out of 5% (30%) goes to funding the pDAO and oDAO (we'll call this "DAO RPL Inflation")
- 3.5% out of 5% (70%) goes to NO's (we'll call this "NO RPL Inflation")
- Distribution is calculated according to RPIP30 as described below:
- If your staked RPL value in ETH is below 10% borrowed ETH, weight is 0
- From 10%-15% borrowed ETH, weight is linear with the amount of borrowed ETH
- 🧮
weight = 100 * staked_rpl_value_in_eth
- 🧮
- Above 15%, weight follows a logarithmic curve, rising forever, but ever-more-slowly
- 🧮
weight = (13.6137 + 2 * ln(100 * (staked_rpl_value_in_eth / borrowed_eth) - 13)) * borrowed_eth
- 🧮
- The NO share of inflation gets split up to each node as
weight/total_summed_weight
- Distribution is calculated according to RPIP30 as described below:
- Source: Samus' Cohesive Proposal
- Summary:
- Change distribution of "NO RPL Inflation" to scale linearly with Node Operator Borrowed Eth. Rewards would be distributed to all NO's as calculated by
(your Borrowed ETH)/(total Protocol Borrowed ETH)
- Change distribution of "NO RPL Inflation" to scale linearly with Node Operator Borrowed Eth. Rewards would be distributed to all NO's as calculated by
- Sources:
- Samus' Cohesive Proposal
- Valdorff's Cohesive Proposal
- Summary:
- Scale down "NO RPL Inflation" from present value (3.5%) to 0% as rETH market share grows from present day to it's soft-limits goal (soft-limit described in RPIP17: Self-Limiting Rocket Pool).
- Leave support for RPL rewards (set setting to zero). Eg, if we wanted to run a short term NO onboarding blitz, it might make sense to add RPL rewards.
- Source: Valdorff's Cohesive Proposal
- Summary:
- Set "NO RPL Inflation" to 0% ending all RPL rewards to NO's.
- In this structure, we don't need to use RPL inflation to get more people staking RPL to meet rETH demand. Insofar as folks have unstaked, they're at least doing a service to RPL stakers by giving up their share. If they're doing something like LPing, then they're further serving RP.
- Source: Samus' Cohesive Proposal
- Summary:
- Add a commission share for the oDAO (set settings to zero to start).
- Add a commission share for the pDAO (set settings to zero to start).
- As rETH TVL grows, the amount of revenue generated from commission becomes large enough that a slice of commission could be used to fund the pDAO and oDAO.
- During the transition period the pDAO and oDAO could have a blend of funding from both ETH commission and RPL inflation.