Add in more species #121
Replies: 1 comment
-
A recurring point of confusion is that a species may exist in the database but not be displayed on https://fallingfruit.org because it was not considered of sufficient food interest to be placed in the
I'm not too keen about pre-populating the database with types that may or may not be used some day. Currently, new types are introduced incrementally by users when they do not find what they are looking for in the list. These "pending types" are then reviewed (sporadically, when I have time) and either merged with an existing type, cleaned up as needed and published as a new official type, or left unresolved because they are too ambiguous. The beta website adds the ability to filter locations by these pending types, and assign pending types to locations, which should help address the frustration of users not being able to make use of the types they just submitted. For the others in your list:
Note: The existing feature of suggesting a new type is still missing but is planned for the beta website: falling-fruit/falling-fruit-web#305. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I know this is a low-priority item, but I'd like to write my ideas here anyway - for the off-chance they get worked on one day.
There's a lot of species that aren't mentioned in the list, and adding them would help people know more about what can be foraged than what they think of. Here's what can be added:
maybe others have ones they'd like to add to this list of labels not on the map officially?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions