When "required" means "required", but also "not required because..." #2325
sierra-moxon
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
stub goal: generate an procedure/metamodel element to capture the common use case where we want our models to declare a slot to be "not null" or "required", but when our model is used in practice, it can also accept values that describe why it can not be provided.
more details coming...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions