You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't think surface=ground is incompatible with tracktype=grade2.
According to the wiki, grade2 is mostly solid and without grass in the middle.
The appropriate surface is often compacted but that is always a bit subjective, I use it when material has been added and worked on by machine, but sometimes the road is simply the natural ground that has been naturally compacted over time with regular use.
For that I use surface=ground because it's not dirt and I think it's more precise than unpaved, it's also not grade3 because there is no grass in the middle.
I don't think
surface=ground
is incompatible withtracktype=grade2
.According to the wiki, grade2 is mostly solid and without grass in the middle.
The appropriate surface is often compacted but that is always a bit subjective, I use it when material has been added and worked on by machine, but sometimes the road is simply the natural ground that has been naturally compacted over time with regular use.
For that I use
surface=ground
because it's notdirt
and I think it's more precise thanunpaved
, it's also notgrade3
because there is no grass in the middle.https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/fb90e4da-ead7-b7d4-ada9-c574b6e84f4f
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: