From fa227a75ae1210f6239c7b88553467d8898e1986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: overlookmotel <theoverlookmotel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 18:58:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] TODO

---
 TODO.md | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 TODO.md

diff --git a/TODO.md b/TODO.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cfd2fcf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/TODO.md
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# TODO
+
+* Tests
+* Test for `"use strict"` directive in function not being moved up to outside `with ()`
+* Test for multiple `with ()`s between var and its binding
+* Test for `with ()` with no `{}` statement block
+* Tests for `with` in `eval()`
+* Tests for `this` where implicitly used by `super()` and `super`
+
+* Raise Github issue for interaction with const violations
+
+e.g. How to deal with this? Whether `x = 2` is a const violation depends on whether `obj` has a property called `x` or not.
+
+```js
+const x = 1;
+with (obj) {
+  module.exports = () => { x = 2; };
+}
+```