Replies: 1 comment
-
On Thursday, 1 June 2023 04:57:20 EDT plein wrote:
It's feasible, but as to whether we should do it, I think, replication is
unavoidable and necessary for decentralization, anonymity is better offered
by a specialized network of forwarders (persistent anonymous storage is
hated), an anonymity network provides E2E connection with both sides
anonymized (which is maximally anonymous).
It overlays Locutus on Lokinet. Optimization may be done by reducing 2 DHT
lookups into 1 (both overlay networks have their own DHT and address
resolution) not sure about the details.
do you have a link to the project page for locutus?
…
Locutus doesn't carry a lot of data. It's kind of a cache. Trade
space/bandwidth/compute off for anonymity/decentralization/security.
Although solo servers running on lokinet offer enough decentralization (no
single point to be taken down), Locutus can be a plus.
--
~jeff
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
It's feasible, but as to whether we should do it, I think, replication is unavoidable and necessary for decentralization, anonymity is better offered by a specialized network of forwarders (persistent anonymous storage is hated), an anonymity network provides E2E connection with both sides anonymized (which is maximally anonymous).
It overlays Locutus on Lokinet. Optimization may be done by reducing 2 DHT lookups into 1 (both overlay networks have their own DHT and address resolution) not sure about the details.
Locutus doesn't carry a lot of data. It's kind of a cache. Trade space/bandwidth/compute off for anonymity/decentralization/security. Although solo servers running on lokinet offer enough decentralization (no single point to be taken down), Locutus can be a plus.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions