We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
I just came across an interesting corner case: some bins have samples of the same probability.
The code below will reproduce the error.
import calibration as cal model_probs = [[0.5507, 0.4493], [0.8764, 0.1236], [0.1822, 0.8178], [0.3814, 0.6186], [0.9725, 0.0275], [0.281, 0.719 ], [0.8817, 0.1183], [0.8193, 0.1807], [0.4806, 0.5194], [0.9415, 0.0585], [0.4648, 0.5352], [0.9561, 0.0439]] labels = [0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0] calibrator = cal.PlattBinnerMarginalCalibrator(len(labels), num_bins=4) calibrator.train_calibration(model_probs, labels) print (calibrator._bins)
The shape of the first row in calibrator._bins is (3,) instead of (4,) as expected.
We looked into the reason and found that the last two bins have samples of the same probabilities.
We are wondering whether in such a case, an error message should be thrown out or the probabilities should have been added with noises.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
I just came across an interesting corner case: some bins have samples of the same probability.
The code below will reproduce the error.
The shape of the first row in calibrator._bins is (3,) instead of (4,) as expected.
We looked into the reason and found that the last two bins have samples of the same probabilities.
We are wondering whether in such a case, an error message should be thrown out or the probabilities should have been added with noises.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: