You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@antolinos : at the moment the scoring does not apply partial matching to the terms.
The use case that you highlighted in this issue is totally possible.
To answer your questions:
If you search for diff, only the items that contains exactly the term generated applying lemmatization to the word diff will be scored and returned. We should discuss more about this topic if we want to return all the items that contains term which include diff
At the moment, I do not see that as a problem, but I'm open for discussing the topic and how to implement the necessary changes if they are approved.
I was expecting that because the implementation is doing stemming:
to get more items that are matched when the query=diff than query=diffraction
However, my tests demonstrate the opposite, the query
diffraction
has 239 results whilst the query diff has 0 results.For the records, this is the list of terms that contains the word diff:
My questions are:
Should not we expect a term called
diff
because is the root?Is it a problem if a user queries by
diff
and there is no result?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: